3 ms·
Okay that's fair enough that it might eat some jobs, although I don't think the AI will get good enough to replace dev jobs. For copywriting I think that it's l
by DubbaThony 4y ago
Okay that's fair enough that it might eat some jobs, although I don't think the AI will get good enough to replace dev jobs. For copywriting I think that it's likely that it may divide the work to 2 segments - "very cheap but comparatively low quality" one and one where it's actual human work, who may or may not use AI to increase own work efficiency. Anyhow - I see it as a tool, rather than replacement - and isn't that great that we are getting more and more potent tools? Same goes with google translate at the moment, it's translations are good enough to convey the thing that you want to say in other language, but it's far from good quality translation. I think it's awesome that people and companies can communicate without language barrier and without breaking the bank for it, especially if someone is on low budget. Professionally translated message is still better than machine translated one, even though the tech had many years to mature.
I know that that's neighter here or there - but my biggest worry with AI is completely different - it isn't big stretch if the tech progresses that it could be used to check on our private communications, to for example probe if we aren't speaking a thing that given corporation disagrees with at given moment. Otherwise they would need a lot of manual labor for that.