That’s not how courts have ever interpreted things and this isn’t just my opinion. One of us is running into a brick wall in this conversation and that brick w

That’s not how courts have ever interpreted things and this isn’t just my opinion. One of us is running into a brick wall in this conversation and that brick wall is “has read related case and statutory law”. What I’ve been doing is pretending we’re having an objective conversation about copyright so logically I’m treating this closer to a mock trial. I’m not actually sure what you’re doing but I would recommend referencing, you know, the extensive evidence you have to support claims of what is or isn’t infringing.