4 ms·
You are addressing a seperate claim to the one made. The actual claim is that there are no ethical super-wealthy people, not that such a thing is a logical impo
by calderknight 4y ago
You are addressing a seperate claim to the one made. The actual claim is that there are no ethical super-wealthy people, not that such a thing is a logical impossibility.
- fastball 4y agoI guess my issue is that the claim was not demonstrated in any way whatsoever besides "because I say so", so I assumed that the poster must think that it is a logical impossibility – otherwise how could they be so certain?
- calderknight 4y agoA thing can have a probability of zero, while being logically possible.
- fastball 4y agoI'm not seeing any probabilistic models either.