I'd guess cognitive dissonance. The prevalent anti-anti-RA viewpoints I've seen basically write off the power imbalance between a corporate attestation-demander

I'd guess cognitive dissonance. The prevalent anti-anti-RA viewpoints I've seen basically write off the power imbalance between a corporate attestation-demander and the computationally disenfranchised individual, in favor of asserting that the individual can always "choose" to not participate. Basically the same fallacy as asserting that all employment is voluntary, etc. (Just for context I think it's a useful starting assumption, but an airtight axiom it is not. And the excluded middle nature of tech means those details being assumed away will grow and spread to most every interaction - similar to how many simple read only websites hassle users with CAPTCHAs these days)