4 ms·

Thanks for that, it makes sense using your definition. I'm curious as to whether you agree with the parent comment that the subset could contain 'more' propert

Thanks for that, it makes sense using your definition. I'm curious as to whether you agree with the parent comment that the subset could contain 'more' properties than the superset. My understanding from your stricter definition is that (by definition) all potential properties (o for o in O where p(o) = 1) must be contained within O. If the answer is that the superset O has fewer properties where every p(o) = 1 then I agree, and I was overthinking it

Karrot_Kream 4y ago
> If the answer is that the superset O has fewer properties where every p(o) = 1 then I agree, and I was overthinking it It's just this honestly. A superset will generally have fewer properties which apply across the whole set.