3 ms·

FWIW the "PS3 is faster" is still debated to this day, mainly due to the Cell's "weird" architecture If you remove the SPE's from the equation (which many deve

FWIW the "PS3 is faster" is still debated to this day, mainly due to the Cell's "weird" architecture If you remove the SPE's from the equation (which many developers did) the PS3 has a much slower 2 Ghz Dual Core PPC64 CPU, while the Xbox has a 3.2Ghz Triple Core (6 thread) PPC64 The extra threads aren't directly as useful as games back then were almost entirely single-threaded, a trend that has only begun to really change course in the last decade or so (partially due to the Xbone and PS4 having anemic Bulldozer derived CPU's that had weak single-thread performance)

ChuckNorris89 4y ago
>PS3 has a much slower 2 Ghz Dual Core PPC64 CPU IIRC it's not even a dual core but a single core with two threads. Sony really dropped the ball with the PS3 chip. It's a shame they invested hundreds of millions or even billions in this new, hot, complicated to use chip, only for it to be completely surpassed by off the shelf x86 parts. Sony though the chip would be so good they could sell it to be used in super computers for years to come, but by the time it was out, x86 had basically caught up and no customers cared about buying their cell processor.