I wonder if a distinction needs to be made here between "sexual" and "romantic" attraction. I suspect that a Roman man marrying or expressing love interest in a

I wonder if a distinction needs to be made here between "sexual" and "romantic" attraction. I suspect that a Roman man marrying or expressing love interest in another man would be perceived very differently from engaging in sexual activity with another man. And if the article's premise about power and masculinity is correct, then maybe even the specific sex acts you engage in might be viewed very differently.