3 ms·
I will say it seems utterly bonkers, given the cost of airliners, that we're talking about transmission costs on the order of minutes and not doing per-second u
by XorNot 4y ago
I will say it seems utterly bonkers, given the cost of airliners, that we're talking about transmission costs on the order of minutes and not doing per-second updates.
Admittedly a lot of this was before our new era of satellite constellations, but surely the future should now be "per second updates and streaming audio/video via satellite"?
- dale_glass 4y agoAirliners are expensive, but satellites are even more so. Also there's a whole lot of air traffic.
- lxgr 4y agoYou don't need one satellite per airplane, just like you don't need one base station per mobile phone. Modern satellites can shift terabits per second. They can handle a lat/long pair every couple of minutes sent by every oceanic flight in the air comfortably (even when only using the L-band, which needs much smaller and simpler antennas than those used for in-flight Wi-Fi).