4 ms·
All of their businesses that display ads could display ads from AdWords/DoubleClick, Facebook, Microsoft, and Amazon, just like any other website that hosts thi
by basch 4y ago
All of their businesses that display ads could display ads from AdWords/DoubleClick, Facebook, Microsoft, and Amazon, just like any other website that hosts third party ads.
- scarface74 4y agoSo now the government is going to force a separation into multiple companies and by doing so increase user tracking and sharing information across companies… Win???
- shadowgovt 4y agoYou and I are in agreement. It's one of the reasons I think trying to break up Google is actually a terrible idea for the health of the Internet (in any frame of reference other than an anarchist "burn it to the ground" mentality).
- crazygringo 4y agoI'm not defending it, but the win would be for website owners who might make slightly more profits, and advertisers who might pay slightly less for ads -- all because increased competition would reduce profits by ad exchanges. Of course, that's against not just more tracking/sharing as you mention, but also probably significantly worse ad loading times and bloat in general. It's awfully hard and hypothetical to estimate the impact of either.
- scarface74 4y agoYou realize you’re really supporting the Bork view that anti trust should be about user harm. Everything you said makes the user experience worse.
- crazygringo 4y ago> You realize you’re really supporting You realize I literally prefaced it with "I'm not defending it"? > Everything you said makes the user experience worse. Yes, that was the whole point of my second sentence. I was just explaining why some people do see it as a win. Even if you disagree, it's not an absurd position to take.