3 ms·
It also constitutes a misunderstanding of the license. There's no need to clone into public view if you are your only user.
by stonogo 4y ago
It also constitutes a misunderstanding of the license. There's no need to clone into public view if you are your only user.
- emurlin 4y agoI was thinking the same, but according to [1] some parameters like the hostname are hard-coded. So, that might be why you need to make the code public on GitHub (although still, technically you can still comply with the AGPL with a private repository). [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34508935 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34508935
- ssddanbrown 4y agoI've raised this with them previously but they were adamant their wording was correct. I have details of my conversations with them within my repo [1] where I store examples of licensing confusion. [1] https://github.com/ssddanbrown/Open-Source-Confusers#calcom https://github.com/ssddanbrown/Open-Source-Confusers#calcom