3 ms·
To clarify, you have to have at least ONE of those: > Age: outside the range of 30-50 years > Gender: does not identify as male > Sexual orientation: does no
by belval 4y ago
To clarify, you have to have at least ONE of those:
> Age: outside the range of 30-50 years
> Gender: does not identify as male
> Sexual orientation: does not identify as heterosexual
> Geographical: not located in North America, Western Europe and UK, or East Asia
> Race: non-White
I have no idea what the point of this is. I'm 25 so I'm "ok". Any woman or non-binary is "ok", any "non-white" is "ok".
This means that anyone except John Doe, the white, straight 30-something US-based researcher can submit which is just discrimination but with a whitelist instead of a blacklist to sound more inclusive.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- lostmsu 4y agoMy take on this was best described by this comment: https://old.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/10k31w3/d_iclr_now_has_a_track_with_racebased_and_more/j5p79lk/ https://old.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/10k31w3/d_... But why does it matter that there's a [ed.:conjunction]? It's still discrimination. Anyone who is part of any of this group has reason to react vigorously, to ensure that the group he's part of isn't going to be systematically discriminated against. This is a literal rule restricting who can publish certain kinds of things at a certain venue based on ethnicity-- partially, yes, but based on ethnicity.
- impossiblefork 4y agoAh, that's my comment. I think I got it right, with the way I formulated it.