4 ms·
> and large corporations that dump 3000 machines assume they have been destroyed You clearly did not read, or comprehend, the quote you just pasted in here.
by tristor 4y ago
> and large corporations that dump 3000 machines assume they have been destroyed
You clearly did not read, or comprehend, the quote you just pasted in here. This is someone committing fraud against the companies paying them to destroy decommissioned computer systems, something they may be legally obligated to do for compliance reasons. They're trying to make a buck on the backend instead of doing what their customers paid them to do.
I read, and comprehended the article, did you?
From the HN guidelines [1]:
"Please don't comment on whether someone read an article."
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- bambax 4y ago> I read, and comprehended the article, did you? > From the HN guidelines [1]: "Please don't comment on whether someone read an article." Is this supposed to be funny or ironic? I find it's neither.
- katbyte 4y agoAnd one comment up: > From TFA, which you clearly did not read: It’s a fair comment and callout in response.