I'm not sure the technology itself is evil, it is the business model that is the problem. Which is to say that you don't need to be a software developer to be m

I'm not sure the technology itself is evil, it is the business model that is the problem. Which is to say that you don't need to be a software developer to be morally compromised, you could be a secretary/recruiter/etc and still feel compromised by this employer's practices. The only reason they aren't just trying to charge for physical mail letter reviews is that that is too transparent, the public understands exactly how immoral that is. Once you add technology a lot of people's brains shut off because of the "complexity" they assume exists, particularly once the vendor starts with the buzzword vomit (e.g. "High Security cloud service utilizes the latest deep learning technology to detect abuse and illegal subjects, then we have a team of experienced experts for secondary review"). So tech is the smoke-screen here, but it is immoral no matter how you slice it.