2 ms·
Do you mean "upset with Mozilla"? The PWA Wikipedia article claims that Safari has better PWA support than Firefox.
by runjake 4y ago
Do you mean "upset with Mozilla"? The PWA Wikipedia article claims that Safari has better PWA support than Firefox.
- Snitch-Thursday 4y agoPer [1], PWAs on webkit lacks push notifications, full-screen display, hardware acceleration, web bluetooth as major headline features needed, which Firefox on mobile appears to generally support per a 5-second glance (I didn't see web bluetooth, but the rest I did) [2]. That wikipedia page has a support table saying IOS supports PWAs as YES and Firefox as NO is odd considering Apple requires Mozilla to ship a crippled form of safari on IOS, if Firefox could ship their own true application, I suspect they would have better PWA support as a differentiator with Safari. [1] https://thenewstack.io/owa-takes-on-apples-browser-ban-for-pwa-parity/ https://thenewstack.io/owa-takes-on-apples-browser-ban-for-p... [2] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web_apps https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Progressive_web...
- Wevah 4y agoIf I’ve read correctly [1], Safari on macOS 13 (released after the mentioned article) supports the standardized Web Push APIs. [1] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/usernotifications/sending_web_push_notifications_in_safari_and_other_browsers https://developer.apple.com/documentation/usernotifications/...
- dmitriid 4y ago> web bluetooth as major headline features needed "web bluetooth" and many other hardware APIs are Chrome-only non-standards that OWA pretends are standards and core features for PWAs.