3 ms·
The scrap part is the worst of this. Nice single use laptops on 3 year turnover cycles? No thanks. Unless Apple is responsible for turning the left overs into u
by scetron 4y ago
The scrap part is the worst of this. Nice single use laptops on 3 year turnover cycles? No thanks. Unless Apple is responsible for turning the left overs into usable objects and not diverted to e-waste.
In the article they outline a pretty decent way to overcome this through apple themselves which I'd be much happier with.
- kolinko 4y agoIt goes to scrap if the previous owner didn’t erase it properly. If you do a proper erase, it can be used by a new person with no prob. It’s a safety measure against laptop thieves - if you steal a macbook you cannot resell it.
- uoaei 4y agoIt's also a remarkably effective e-waste creation program. But I don't see the sense in creating more (probably poorly controlled) e-waste as a solution to this problem.
- mannerheim 4y agoThieves eventually learn not to steal worthless bricks.
- theshrike79 4y agoI bought a locked safe and the previous owner didn't give me the combination. The safe maker is unethical and just making waste!
- uoaei 4y agoA safe has a pretty extremely effective security feature that prevents the kinds of thievery at the scale of Apple devices: namely, mass. A secondary contribution of course comes from the tendency to be placed deep inside a building. Apple devices wouldn't sell at all if they tried to implement this kind of security.
- duxup 4y ago> In the article they outline a pretty decent way to overcome this through apple themselves which I'd be much happier with. A process that no user has a reason to follow / sounds like spam. And a 30 day timeout that suddenly makes stolen devices are worth something again. The recyclers themselves need to it worth the owners time to unlock it…
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]