3 ms·

One major benefit of LaTeX is it's free, it will always be free, and it probably looks nice. One major downside of LaTeX generated PDFs is HR's pdf parsers man

One major benefit of LaTeX is it's free, it will always be free, and it probably looks nice. One major downside of LaTeX generated PDFs is HR's pdf parsers mangle them, and you'll spend hours manually keying elements into any application website you're unfortunate enough to encounter. It's probably a wash. For a CV, LaTeX is way, way, way better for your personal bibliography. BibTex/BibLaTeX make it so nice to have a list of publications in your document.

MengerSponge 4y ago
For the five readers who have LaTeX CVs, here's a useful trick. It's easy to add a fleuron to noteworthy publications or elements in a list: \section{Publications} \blfootnote{\adforn{63} indicates Editors' Suggestion} \begin{enumerate}[align=right] \item [\adforn{63}\,\stepcounter{enumi}\labelenumi] \fullcite{greatpaper} \item \fullcite{prettygoodpaper}
deltarholamda 4y ago
>One major downside of LaTeX generated PDFs is HR's pdf parsers mangle them Can you expand on this? I would have thought that parsing a LaTeX PDF would be way, way easier than some random word processor's export-to-PDF.
- MengerSponge 4y ago
  But it isn't some random word processor. It's Word. This might change with the growing use of Google Docs, but Word is basically a monoculture. It might be easier to handle the weirdos who use LaTeX, but there aren't enough of us. There's also a chance that they mangle everybody's documents, and HR is just inflicting hours of toil on millions for no real reason at all. Well structured Word files are based on forms and have well-labeled fields. That might help? I dunno. Maybe a Microsoft person or a Salesforce person can lift the curtain a smidge.
- dietrichepp 4y ago
  LaTeX is old. It was designed long before PDFs existed. Long before Unicode existed. You can get a good PDF out of LaTeX but it requires some work. You’d think that the “semantic” nature of LaTeX makes it easy, but there’s an expansive set of macros between the source document and the PDF. Just one example—LaTeX does things like replace “---” with “—” or replace “fi” with “ﬁ”. How does LaTeX do it? At some point, somebody wrote some code which recognizes those patterns in the source file and emits the appropriate glyph. But these replacements are not equivalent—the “---” em dash needs to be a Unicode character with its own glyph, and “fi” needs to be two characters that share one glyph. Not important for DVI files, but important for PDF files where you want to copy the text out. You can get this to work in LaTeX but it won’t work correctly by default, depending on how you are getting a PDF file. You end up with a preamble in all your LaTeX files to make them work nicely. You also probably want to use xelatex or lualatex instead of pdflatex (I don’t keep up with this stuff—get up to date recommendations elsewhere).
a_e_k 4y ago
I always proof mine with pdftotext. I figure that if that can extract the raw text correctly without mangling it, then it'll probably be okay for whatever applicant tracking system a company is using. (My preference for my resumé these days is LuaLaTeX with nice OpenType fonts.)

MengerSponge 4y ago

For the five readers who have LaTeX CVs, here's a useful trick. It's easy to add a fleuron to noteworthy publications or elements in a list: \section{Publications} \blfootnote{\adforn{63} indicates Editors' Suggestion} \begin{enumerate}[align=right] \item [\adforn{63}\,\stepcounter{enumi}\labelenumi] \fullcite{greatpaper} \item \fullcite{prettygoodpaper}

deltarholamda 4y ago

>One major downside of LaTeX generated PDFs is HR's pdf parsers mangle them Can you expand on this? I would have thought that parsing a LaTeX PDF would be way, way easier than some random word processor's export-to-PDF.

MengerSponge 4y ago
But it isn't some random word processor. It's Word. This might change with the growing use of Google Docs, but Word is basically a monoculture. It might be easier to handle the weirdos who use LaTeX, but there aren't enough of us. There's also a chance that they mangle everybody's documents, and HR is just inflicting hours of toil on millions for no real reason at all. Well structured Word files are based on forms and have well-labeled fields. That might help? I dunno. Maybe a Microsoft person or a Salesforce person can lift the curtain a smidge.
dietrichepp 4y ago
LaTeX is old. It was designed long before PDFs existed. Long before Unicode existed. You can get a good PDF out of LaTeX but it requires some work. You’d think that the “semantic” nature of LaTeX makes it easy, but there’s an expansive set of macros between the source document and the PDF. Just one example—LaTeX does things like replace “---” with “—” or replace “fi” with “ﬁ”. How does LaTeX do it? At some point, somebody wrote some code which recognizes those patterns in the source file and emits the appropriate glyph. But these replacements are not equivalent—the “---” em dash needs to be a Unicode character with its own glyph, and “fi” needs to be two characters that share one glyph. Not important for DVI files, but important for PDF files where you want to copy the text out. You can get this to work in LaTeX but it won’t work correctly by default, depending on how you are getting a PDF file. You end up with a preamble in all your LaTeX files to make them work nicely. You also probably want to use xelatex or lualatex instead of pdflatex (I don’t keep up with this stuff—get up to date recommendations elsewhere).

a_e_k 4y ago

I always proof mine with pdftotext. I figure that if that can extract the raw text correctly without mangling it, then it'll probably be okay for whatever applicant tracking system a company is using. (My preference for my resumé these days is LuaLaTeX with nice OpenType fonts.)