3 ms·
I consider Wikipedia to be a massive curated set of information. It also includes a lot of references and links to additional good information / source material
by daveguy 4y ago
I consider Wikipedia to be a massive curated set of information. It also includes a lot of references and links to additional good information / source materials. Companies try to get spin added and it's usually very well controlled. I worry that a lot of ai generated dreck will seep into Wikipedia, but I am hopeful the moderation will continue to function well.
- westurner 4y agoList of Web directories: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_directories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_directories ; DMOZ FTW Distributed Version Control > Work model > Pull Request: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_version_control#Pull_requests https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_version_control#Pu... sindresorhus/awesome: https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome#contents https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome#contents bayandin/awesome-awesomeness: https://github.com/bayandin/awesome-awesomeness https://github.com/bayandin/awesome-awesomeness "Help compare Comment and Annotation services: moderation, spam, notifications, configurability" https://github.com/executablebooks/meta/discussions/102 https://github.com/executablebooks/meta/discussions/102 Re: fact checks, schema.org/ClaimReview, W3C Verifiable Claims, W3C Verifiable News & Epistemology: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15529140 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15529140 W3C Web Annotations could contain (cryptographically-signed (optionally with a W3C DID)) Verifiable Claims; comments with signed Linked Data