2 ms·
> Published content will be later used to train subsequent models, and being able to distinguish AI from human input may be very valuable going forward Not nec
by visarga 4y ago
> Published content will be later used to train subsequent models, and being able to distinguish AI from human input may be very valuable going forward
Not necessarily all AI contents are bad and all human contents are good. We need a way to separate the good from the bad, not AI from human, and it might be impossible to do 100% correct anyway.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 4y agoI think I would compare it to Stack Overflow. Some of the solutions do exist there, but not all are applicable to the use case or the exact circumstances the person asks there and yet the prompt used by AI would remain the same. SO has its rating system, but it has the same issue as the sentence above. From that perspective, we have identified potentially good human output ( assuming it wasn't already pollinated with AI output, which seems less and less likely ) that should only be accessible by humans and we would need a separate forum for bad AI output ( that should be verified by humans as bad but maybe only be accessible by AI once verified ). I am just spitballing. I do not really have a solution in mind. It just sounds like an interesting problem going forward.