4 ms·

I don't see the point. There's lots of old content out there that won't get tagged, so lacking the tag doesn't mean it's AI generated. Meanwhile people abusing

I don't see the point. There's lots of old content out there that won't get tagged, so lacking the tag doesn't mean it's AI generated. Meanwhile people abusing AI for profit (eg, generating AI driven blogs to stick ads on them) wouldn't want to tag their sites in a way that might get them ignored. And what are the consequences for lying?

rgrieselhuber 4y ago
It would basically depend on how serious the search engines are about wanting created vs. generated content. Generated content is ultimately going to be a regurgitation.
westurner 4y ago
Does use of a search engine violate the "No AI" covenant with oneself? Variation on the Turning Test: prove that it's not a human claiming to be a computer. Modeling premises and Meta-analysis are again necessary elements for critical reasoning about Sources and Methods and superpositions of Ignorance and Malice.
- jhbadger 4y ago
  Maybe this could encourage the recreation of the original Yahoo! (If you don't remember, Yahoo! started out not as a search engine in the Google sense but as a collection of human curated links to websites about various topics)
  - daveguy 4y ago
    I consider Wikipedia to be a massive curated set of information. It also includes a lot of references and links to additional good information / source materials. Companies try to get spin added and it's usually very well controlled. I worry that a lot of ai generated dreck will seep into Wikipedia, but I am hopeful the moderation will continue to function well.
    - westurner 4y ago
      List of Web directories: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_directories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_directories ; DMOZ FTW Distributed Version Control > Work model > Pull Request: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_version_control#Pull_requests https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_version_control#Pu... sindresorhus/awesome: https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome#contents https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome#contents bayandin/awesome-awesomeness: https://github.com/bayandin/awesome-awesomeness https://github.com/bayandin/awesome-awesomeness "Help compare Comment and Annotation services: moderation, spam, notifications, configurability" https://github.com/executablebooks/meta/discussions/102 https://github.com/executablebooks/meta/discussions/102 Re: fact checks, schema.org/ClaimReview, W3C Verifiable Claims, W3C Verifiable News & Epistemology: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15529140 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15529140 W3C Web Annotations could contain (cryptographically-signed (optionally with a W3C DID)) Verifiable Claims; comments with signed Linked Data

rgrieselhuber 4y ago

It would basically depend on how serious the search engines are about wanting created vs. generated content. Generated content is ultimately going to be a regurgitation.

westurner 4y ago

Does use of a search engine violate the "No AI" covenant with oneself? Variation on the Turning Test: prove that it's not a human claiming to be a computer. Modeling premises and Meta-analysis are again necessary elements for critical reasoning about Sources and Methods and superpositions of Ignorance and Malice.

jhbadger 4y ago
Maybe this could encourage the recreation of the original Yahoo! (If you don't remember, Yahoo! started out not as a search engine in the Google sense but as a collection of human curated links to websites about various topics)
- daveguy 4y ago
  I consider Wikipedia to be a massive curated set of information. It also includes a lot of references and links to additional good information / source materials. Companies try to get spin added and it's usually very well controlled. I worry that a lot of ai generated dreck will seep into Wikipedia, but I am hopeful the moderation will continue to function well.
  - westurner 4y ago
    List of Web directories: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_directories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_directories ; DMOZ FTW Distributed Version Control > Work model > Pull Request: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_version_control#Pull_requests https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_version_control#Pu... sindresorhus/awesome: https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome#contents https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome#contents bayandin/awesome-awesomeness: https://github.com/bayandin/awesome-awesomeness https://github.com/bayandin/awesome-awesomeness "Help compare Comment and Annotation services: moderation, spam, notifications, configurability" https://github.com/executablebooks/meta/discussions/102 https://github.com/executablebooks/meta/discussions/102 Re: fact checks, schema.org/ClaimReview, W3C Verifiable Claims, W3C Verifiable News & Epistemology: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15529140 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15529140 W3C Web Annotations could contain (cryptographically-signed (optionally with a W3C DID)) Verifiable Claims; comments with signed Linked Data