4 ms·
I’d argue chrome, android, gmail, maps, drive, and Chromebook OS are pretty dominant in their respective markets, and objectively these products defined the fut
by bbor 4y ago
I’d argue chrome, android, gmail, maps, drive, and Chromebook OS are pretty dominant in their respective markets, and objectively these products defined the future of their industries many times by popularizing features that went on to become mandatory for competitors. A lot of these started before 2013, sure, but I think it would be hard to say any of those products have been stagnant, and I think most SWEs recognize how hard it is to maintain and update such huge products.
Additionally, they’ve definitely met wall street’s expectations, with profit and stock price growing steadily for many of the last 10 years, which is what these jokers care about.
All of this is, of course, on top of the part we take for granted: they still completely dominate search and defended their total control over many parts of the Display ads industry.
My point isn’t that they’re necessarily geniuses, but I think your bias against giant evil multinational corporations (which I share!) is clouding your judgement. I’d say they control the internet more than any other company, and the internet is the home of the modern economy.
- spullara 4y agoBut only Search/Adsense is a great business? Youtube might be one, one day?
- philliphaydon 4y agoOh absolutely they have other things that have done well. But for every 1 successful product they have like 10 failed. Hence my comment of throwing mud at the wall to see what sticks. I just think that we are giving them more credit than they deserve. Doesn't mean there aren't exceptionally talented people there. Can imagine some of the guys working on stadia would have been incredibly talented. But they killed it off, never even got to try it as it wasn't available in SG/TW.