> it’s likely pareto or close Which makes bottom 5% firing even more dumb Sure, I'd agree with that. I was just trying to say I can see where the "on paper" lo

> it’s likely pareto or close Which makes bottom 5% firing even more dumb Sure, I'd agree with that. I was just trying to say I can see where the "on paper" logic comes from. But the on paper falls apart in the real world, where we're not dealing with "resources", but people. But, yea, I think even the "on paper" case is weaker than it naively appears.