3 ms·
A cure for aging, would, of course, not be shared equally across the globe. It would be monopolized by the very rich, who would establish a permanent aristocrac
by ProjectArcturis 4y ago
A cure for aging, would, of course, not be shared equally across the globe. It would be monopolized by the very rich, who would establish a permanent aristocracy. Cultural attitudes would be frozen in time. It would be a hellscape for everyone except the very top.
- stephc_int13 4y agoWhy would it be different for aging that any other medicine? Not perfectly distributed, but largely available nonetheless.
- mensetmanusman 4y agoBecause immortality is different than health-span…
- astrange 4y agoRich people aren't rich enough to do that. That's just not enough customers.
- ProjectArcturis 4y agoHow much would Warren Buffett pay to be 20 years old again?
- astrange 4y agoThe revealed preferences aren't promising, considering his unhealthy diet.