2 ms·
I don’t think that’s completely true. Pascal was also designed as a general purpose language to compete with Algol and Fortran. See for example Wirth’s https:/
by Someone 4y ago
I don’t think that’s completely true. Pascal was also designed as a general purpose language to compete with Algol and Fortran.
See for example Wirth’s https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/bitstream/handle/20.500.11850/68712/eth-3290-01.pdf https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/bitstream/handle/20....:
“Compared to Algol 60, its range of applicability is considerably increased due to a variety of data structuring facilities. In view of its intended usage both as a convenient basis to teach programming and as an efficient tool to write large programs…”
- AnimalMuppet 4y agoMy first reaction was that Pascal's extremely spartan I/O capabilities made that a pipe dream. But then I remembered what Fortran's I/O was like...
- Someone 4y agoYes, the competition wasn’t very strong. You may think Fortran’s I/O was bad, but at least it had I/O, unlike Algol 60 (the standard didn’t define I/O, so every compiler invented its own way of doing I/O)