Sorry about the blase reply, then. > Au contraire, the leap of logic is assuming that computer programs could never be sentient. That’s not quite what I meant

Sorry about the blase reply, then. > Au contraire, the leap of logic is assuming that computer programs could never be sentient. That’s not quite what I meant. I don’t categorically dismiss the possibility. > We simply don’t have any proof either way, so we have to assume the possibility. Like God?