2 ms·
> The "smallest meaningful unit of distance" stuff is nonsense. Why?
by naasking 4y ago
> The "smallest meaningful unit of distance" stuff is nonsense.
Why?
- consilient 4y agoYou get the Planck units by setting c, hbar, G, and Boltzmann's constant to 1. This is convenient for notational purposes but it has no inherent physical significance.
- naasking 4y agoThat isn't the only way to argue for a minimal significant distance. Arguably QM sets a strict ~60-70 digit precision limit on physical constants [1], beyond which you arguably can't differentiate between discrete and continuous theories, and so a minimum distance seems like a perfectly sensible way to frame it. [1] https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/16889/non-computable-numbers-in-physics#comment40236_16893 https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/16889/non-comput...