4 ms·
Yeah, it sounds like you’re assuming two things things here which are often (or usually) wrong: 1. No cross-validation, and 2. You have the ability to solve f
by klodolph 4y ago
Yeah, it sounds like you’re assuming two things things here which are often (or usually) wrong:
1. No cross-validation, and
2. You have the ability to solve for additional parameters without losing accuracy.
Statistics is not intuitive.