Assuming you already have all the possible evidence already leads to falsehoods. Science is about not embracing falsehoods, if it is anything. What you promote

Assuming you already have all the possible evidence already leads to falsehoods. Science is about not embracing falsehoods, if it is anything. What you promote is what cemented "Clovis first" for decades beyond its sell-by date, and opposition to the K-T bolide model and plate tectonics. Pretending to know interferes with coming to know. For a more recent example: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0012825221001781?via%3Dihub https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00128... Opposition was sloppy to the point of dishonesty.