3 ms·
Ah "misinformation". (Which seems to be far-left speak for "has a different opinion and I'd rather censor them than argue with them".) Rogan is a comedian and h
by overgard 4y ago
Ah "misinformation". (Which seems to be far-left speak for "has a different opinion and I'd rather censor them than argue with them".) Rogan is a comedian and has never claimed any special expertise. If you're worried that people listen to him over the legacy news media, well, what does it say about them that somehow a comedian has more credibility than they do?
- popularrecluse 4y agoThere will always be an acceptable range of discourse in any society, and those that in their own ignorance and confusion spread ideas that hurt the stability and well-being of that society can expect pushback. Sorry if you wanted to say whatever bullshit you want without a challenge. If you don't like it disconnect your internet, as you'd say.
- overgard 4y agoNever said it should go unchallenged. What a lovely strawman you've built. Free speech is great, and if someone says something incorrect, the solution is more speech to counteract it. I think part of why Rogan is so popular is because legacy media and woke activists have such a bad reputation for trying to control the narrative rather than engage in discourse, which is what he does. I just said I don't have a problem with him stating his opinion and I'm sick of people trying to censor a goddamn comedian because they're jealous he built a large audience. I fail to see how Rogan threatens the stability of society. I mean, it's hilarious other than that you're actually serious about that. I'm far more afraid of censorship than I am of Rogan talking to some goofball. (BTW, you haven't even stated why Rogan threatens the stability of society or what he's done). I think I'll keep my internet connection friend.
- Sohcahtoa82 4y ago> If you're worried that people listen to him over the legacy news media, well, what does it say about them that somehow a comedian has more credibility than they do? It says absolutely nothing about the "legacy news media". It just means that many people are incredibly gullible. Joe Rogan does not have more credibility, but some people THINK he does, and that's the problem.
- overgard 4y agoI think that's frankly a condescending world view. Who made you the arbiter of what's true and what's not? Listening to Joe Rogan doesn't mean you agree, it just means he brings on interesting guests and trusts his viewers to make up their own mind. Who do you think people are more inclined to listen to, someone that treats their audience with respect, or someone that calls a broad swath of the population idiots?
- Sohcahtoa82 4y ago> Who made you the arbiter of what's true and what's not? Nobody. But I'm going to trust the opinions of people who are experts in their field much more than some comedian. > or someone that calls a broad swath of the population idiots? If you trust Joe more than the experts, then well, if the shoe fits...