3 ms·
Lol, funny, I dig it. Right here in real life I just do http://zim-wiki.org http://zim-wiki.org + a custom CSS Template + a few shell scripts. http://jrm4.com
by jrm4 4y ago
Lol, funny, I dig it.
Right here in real life I just do http://zim-wiki.org http://zim-wiki.org + a custom CSS Template + a few shell scripts.
http://jrm4.com http://jrm4.com
- adityaathalye 4y agoThanks :) Likewise, I'm basically locked into "life in plaintext", as a die-hard orgmode user. With what I have on disk, a big positive is any "system" of organisation is opt-in, post-hoc, and fungible. Like, today, shite can be seen as merely one lens into a subset of my org files, to compile that subset into a website. Tomorrow I could bring back hugo. That choice has no bearing on how any other method of organisation might use those same files (e.g. I can pull up index views using orgmode's own query feature set). And further, a single blog posts's org file can power live demos in Emacs (org-babel), and gets exported as a blog post, and as a PDF slide deck, like this: https://www.evalapply.org/posts/why-and-how-i-use-org-mode/index.html#a-pretty-good-example-of-my-usage https://www.evalapply.org/posts/why-and-how-i-use-org-mode/i...