3 ms·
Emoticons are less intrusive method of aggregating the public sentiment. Would you want the contents of you emails analyzed to help predict the future?
by kwamenum86 18y ago
Emoticons are less intrusive method of aggregating the public sentiment. Would you want the contents of you emails analyzed to help predict the future?
- gojomo 18y agoNo, it's not less intrusive. Emoticons are essentially words like any others. Grabbing the emoticon words from writing (public or private) is no different than sampling other classes of words, such as all adjectives or verbs. And no, I would not volunteer any part of my private communications for a third party to analyze for their own benefit.
- kwamenum86 18y agoIt is a little different. The amount of information you garner from ":)" versus "Gee, I think I am going to liquidate now" are completely different. It is a matter of sentiment analysis versus content analysis. But I see why you say "it's not less intrusive". I think sentiment analysis is less intrusive, especially if you are just looking at emoticons, because they reveal less about you. The information encoded in the emoticon has less clarity. It's reasonable that you might find any amount of intrusion unacceptable though. Doesn't Google look at the contents of your (subject being gmail users) email anyway to serve ads on Gmail right now though? The scary thing is I think people would just get used to it if it were useful. Of course I think (hope) we are all engaging in this conversation assuming this will never happen.