4 ms·
I guess Java caught up, but for a long time it was just too restrictive. C# was so much more joy to program in for a long time, even though they were equivalen
by xiphias2 4y ago
I guess Java caught up, but for a long time it was just too restrictive.
C# was so much more joy to program in for a long time, even though they were equivalent languages in safety/speed tradeoff.
- LadyCailin 4y agoC# still has a lot to learn from Java. Just today I found myself annoyed that C# doesn’t have diamond operator for inferred right hand generics.
- int_19h 4y agoI might be missing something, but C# lets you omit the classname in "new" entirely if the target type of the expression is known - isn't that even shorter?