3 ms·
For me it's more about balancing the opportunity cost of possibly not knowing this one important fact with the pain that is realizing how much of the stuff I am
by 0x008 4y ago
For me it's more about balancing the opportunity cost of possibly not knowing this one important fact with the pain that is realizing how much of the stuff I am actually failing to get back to in the end.
So I usually try to answer these questions for me:
1. What is the probability I will actually read it?
2. How much benefit is actually contained within the information the article might provide?
3. How much stress will I experience when I realize I am not catching up?
If I am honest on most of the things on HN score rather low on 1+2 but medium on 3. I can make the conscious decision that the trade-off is not worth it for me.
Combine that with a rule that either I will read it now or it's not important enough and usually I can browse through the comments a little bit trying to siphon the gist of an article in a couple minutes and failing that I will just move on.
Apart form that it has also helped is realizing that I absolutely loathe reading any long form articles. Even if I am really interested in the topic, I just cannot concentrate long enough to read any technical long form article that contains any form of 'fluff' in the writing. I started to hate reading these kinds of articles more and more.