Since "journalists" don't bother linking to primary sources: From [1] > The Commission has determined that the appropriate remedy is: > (i) a limited exclusi

Since "journalists" don't bother linking to primary sources: From [1] > The Commission has determined that the appropriate remedy is: > (i) a limited exclusion order prohibiting the importation of certain audio players and controllers, components thereof, and products containing the same that infringe one or more of > claims 17, 21, 24, and 26 of the ’258 patent; (System and method for synchronizing operations among a plurality of independently clocked digital data processing devices) [2] > claims 7, 14, and 22-24 of the ’953 patent; (Playback device) [3] > claim 10 of the ’959 patent; (Multi-channel pairing in a media system) [4] > claims 1, 2, and 5 of the ’949 patent; (Method and apparatus for adjusting volume levels in a multi-zone system) [5] > and claims 1, 5, 6, and 12 of the ’896 patent; (Playback device connection) [6] > and (ii) a cease and desist order against Google. [1] https://www.usitc.gov/system/files/secretary/fed_reg_notices/337/337_1191_notice01062022sgl.pdf https://www.usitc.gov/system/files/secretary/fed_reg_notices... [2] https://patents.google.com/patent/US9195258B2 https://patents.google.com/patent/US9195258B2 [3] https://patents.google.com/patent/US10209953B2 https://patents.google.com/patent/US10209953B2 [4] https://patents.google.com/patent/US9219959B2 https://patents.google.com/patent/US9219959B2 [5] https://patents.google.com/patent/US8588949B2 https://patents.google.com/patent/US8588949B2 [6] https://patents.google.com/patent/US10439896B2 https://patents.google.com/patent/US10439896B2