4 ms·
I understand that someone has to be paid to generate AI, but one of the promises of programming of the last couple of years was that if you could afford a lapto
by patientplatypus 4y ago
I understand that someone has to be paid to generate AI, but one of the promises of programming of the last couple of years was that if you could afford a laptop and were smart enough you could contribute to software development by contributing to github and so forth. In practice I don't know how much of that translates into practice (see AWS/cloud/hosting and so forth), but I don't like this future where the only people who are able to program the machines are able to pay for an IDE that has a monthly or per usage cost structure.
The only people who get rich during a gold rush are the people that are selling the shovels. I think that people are tired of rewarding shovel sellers.
- vincent-manis 4y agoDon't forget the, er, “recreation workers”.
- jcq3 4y agoDon't get your point. It's up to you to spend money to boost your productivity, nobody will force developers to use AI powered tools.
- philipphutterer 4y agoPerhaps when the standard of software development shifts towards using AI for everything?
- blagie 4y agoLet me explain the point: * There are hundreds of millions of people living for under $2/day. Coding was a pathway out of poverty. * There are billions of people with family incomes under $30/day. For those families, kids learning to code was a pathway to wealth. If tools to be productive cost money, it will go the same way as other domains of engineering, where you can't be productive without a significant investment. EDA tools to design electronics run $5k-$100k, and making an IC might have NREs of $100k. That places it squarely out-of-line as a career option for many.
- 6gvONxR4sf7o 4y agoIt’s the shovels vs spoons parable all over again.
- blagie 4y agoIt's a different parable. Everyone can afford a shovel. At one point in time, computers were limited to very wealthy folks, like Bill Gates. He learned to program by going to an exclusive private high school which had a computer, and later, in Harvard. He had a unique competitive advantage which allowed him to start Microsoft. A better parable is GNU/Linux/BSD/etc. versus Unix/VAX/etc. Unix cost thousands of dollars. The free alternatives were free. This allowed a whole generation of kids to learn, who didn't have Gates' resources. I wasn't in a private high school, and without Debian, I wouldn't have the life I have.