4 ms·
One thing I've seen "performance" is largely subjective. It is not just X cls or Y design docs (and you can see how these artifacts are easily gameable). A
by flashgordon 4y ago
One thing I've seen "performance" is largely subjective. It is not just X cls or Y design docs (and you can see how these artifacts are easily gameable). A large part is visibility, likeability and awareness of org politics. A lot of them are maximizing personal gain over company gains. As a reasonably well-performing manager and former IC (as well as getting my share of not so great ratings) this was the game I hated but accepted to play - after many years of denial. And don't worry, companies know this. Check out Macleod's hierarchy or Man in the high castle!
So if you are worried that "top" talent will leave don't. Their departure is not damaging the company as much as the boat remaining unrocked!
- janalsncm 4y agoIt’s difficult to measure performance even in the abstract. Every person in the company is a node in the network and even if a person’s objective metrics are lower than another’s, it could be that removing that node destroys institutional knowledge that causes everyone else’s performance to drop. And as far as objective metrics, those are a crapshoot too. See: the software interview process, where people memorize useless toy problems into their brain so they look prepared for performative problem solving.