4 ms·
I'm pretty sure if you'd just prompt GPT-3 it would give an appropriate response to this. Less than half on hour of work.
by ma2rten 4y ago
I'm pretty sure if you'd just prompt GPT-3 it would give an appropriate response to this. Less than half on hour of work.
- smoldesu 4y agoMy larger point is, ChatGPT knows many things that the character doesn't necessarily know. You can anticipate some edge cases, but eventually the system will break in a significant way.
- sebzim4500 4y agoAren't people used to entertaining bugs in games though? It's not like existing conversation systems never lead to absurd situations. E.g. a guard questioning you about bureaucracy while his colleage is being eaten by a dragon in front of him.
- kevinventullo 4y agoActually it took me about two minutes on ChatGPT. My prompt: Suppose a gang leader in the 1800’s is known to hold up trains, rob banks, and sometimes hurt people. If one of his gang members asked him “What is your favorite flavor of pizza roll?”, what would be his response? Response: It is unlikely that a gang leader in the 1800s would have knowledge or interest in a modern convenience food item such as pizza rolls. It would be more appropriate to expect a response related to the gang's criminal activities or the leader's personal beliefs and values. When I augmented the prompt with “Structure your response in the voice of the gang leader”, the response was: ”Listen here, boy. We ain't got no time for talkin' 'bout no fancy pizza rolls. We got trains to hold up, banks to rob, and scores to settle. You best be focusin' on the task at hand or you'll find yerself on the wrong side of my gun." Dutch has cleaner English and is a little less aggressive but I’d say this is not bad!