4 ms·
> 24 FPS looks like garbage. Panning shots are a stuttery mess. This depends on the TV, of course, but I prefer 24 FPS over the soap opera effect.
by fullstop 4y ago
> 24 FPS looks like garbage. Panning shots are a stuttery mess.
This depends on the TV, of course, but I prefer 24 FPS over the soap opera effect.
- mort96 4y agoThat's the thing I'm talking about though. I don't care that you associate better motion with bad soap operas.
- fullstop 4y agoI don't associate it with bad anything. I just don't like the way it looks.
- agentwiggles 4y agoI agree wildly and I'm seriously shocked that the guy above is arguing in favor of it. I can't stand the weird motion smoothing on modern TVs and would not buy any TV where it can't be turned off.
- fullstop 4y agoI get it, maybe, if the source material was filmed at that rate. Interpolation of 24 FPS content to higher rates just looks unnatural.
- mort96 4y agoI'm not arguing in favour of frame interpolation at all. Footage that was shot at 24 FPS should be displayed at 24 FPS. But footage should be shot at a higher FPS.
- agentwiggles 4y agoI could probably get behind that, I'm actually somewhat curious now if it's the higher framerate or only the algorithmic "motion smoothing" that causes the famous soap opera effect.