4 ms·
Apologies! I got that from some blog post somewhere I believe, not from any personal wackereren our judgement (which I should have signalled better in my post).
by maegul 4y ago
Apologies! I got that from some blog post somewhere I believe, not from any personal wackereren our judgement (which I should have signalled better in my post).
Nonetheless, would reading a parquet file with polars be faster than reading a csv?
Also thanks for polars! Great contribution data science!
- ritchie46 4y ago> Apologies! I got that from some blog post somewhere I believe, not from any personal wackereren our judgement (which I should have signalled better in my post). No worries. :) Most blogs on the topic I encounter in the wild make incorrect claims, I understand the confusion. > Nonetheless, would reading a parquet file with polars be faster than reading a csv? Yes, much faster. Please don't use the csv format for anything of a reasonable size. It is a terrible format to process and very ambiguous.