4 ms·
A few hundred kilometers doesn't sound like a big deal to compensate for during the de-orbit burn. Also, couldn't it just orbit multiple times until an optimal
by sgtnoodle 4y ago
A few hundred kilometers doesn't sound like a big deal to compensate for during the de-orbit burn. Also, couldn't it just orbit multiple times until an optimal alignment comes along?
- Gravityloss 4y agoIf you're going 8 km/s in one direction (like you do when orbiting earth), changing direction even a bit is a big deal. That's why the space shuttle had those humongous wings and fragile thermal protection and why its payload ratio was lousy. To be able to go around once and land to the same spot it needed cross range and very good aerodynamics. It doesn't make sense to bring those wings to orbit just for that.
- Gravityloss 4y agoI calculated and changing plane at the pole enough to cause a 200 km shift at the equator would be about 250 m/s delta vee. So not actually impossible.
- Gravityloss 4y agoThe cross range would need to be around 1000 km for Kennedy Space Center... so a real problem.