5 ms·

Which is why even though I don't believe in the bible I would be happy to own a pallet of fancy ones to hawk. I don't believe in crypto. But I know plenty of

Which is why even though I don't believe in the bible I would be happy to own a pallet of fancy ones to hawk. I don't believe in crypto. But I know plenty of religious zealots to sell it to. So I'm happy to own it. My bet is it isn't a dying religion.

toomuchtodo 4y ago
I admire the honesty around investing in the unsophisticated.
- jacquesm 4y ago
  Think about whole institutions created to indoctrinate people roughly from birth to remain unsophisticated.
  - unityByFreedom 4y ago
    [flagged]
    - jacquesm 4y ago
      Sorry?
      - unityByFreedom 4y ago
        [flagged]
        jacquesm 4y ago
        You did not name atheism you made some weird statement about 'the other institution' and how they would prevent births, which makes zero sense at all. Women should have the right to choose what they do with their own bodies, atheists and religious folks alike and those that have no horse in the race should stfu because all they are doing is telling other people how they should live, something that unfortunately is very common.
        unityByFreedom 4y ago
        That's one way of looking at it. But pro-lifers don't see it that way, so I was just presenting another point of view. I don't think telling them to stfu is productive.
        jacquesm 4y ago
        The term 'pro-life' is about as flamebait as it gets so you'll be doing your arguing with yourself on this subject from here forward.
        unityByFreedom 4y ago
        Many people self-describe as pro-life. It is not 'flamebait' for most people and neither is pro-choice.
        Terretta 4y ago
        > The other institution may prevent your birth. Which is worse? You're mixing worldviews in your rejoinder. For an atheist, Atheism not preventing "your" birth as there is no soul ("you") waiting in the wings to prevent. No you to prevent until personhood after birth. Rather, to an atheist, it's enabling the filtering out of unfortunate humanist futures. No child need be brought into unwantedness, disease, insufficient support, or other misfortunes. As there is no supernatural providence (no God to provide), logically, one should not bring forth future humans into a lack of providing. The atheist assumes the mother is best qualified to evaluate this choice, and thus to make it. The atheist further presumes the mother is the person most affected by this choice (there is no other "you" yet), and thus has greatest right to make it. To be clear, many Christians hold the same view as this example atheist, particularly those who think living is defined by knowing, and being dead by not knowing: "For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten." – Ecc. 9:5 Roughly, those who believe there is no separate soul hanging around before or after an independent body by-and-large have no problem with holding a woman has a right to choose.
        unityByFreedom 4y ago
        > To be clear, many Christians hold the same view as this example atheist, particularly those who think living is defined by knowing, and being dead by not knowing And there are many Christians who regard support for abortion within the faith to have been influenced by atheism. I just think it's an interesting question that has no easy answer. When does life begin? Clearly, the fetus is alive. Saying they "don't know" doesn't make sense to me because it's not like I remember my first year outside the womb either.
        vgt 4y ago
        Are you aware that a secular scientific approach to sexual health results in far fewer abortions? Chiefly proper sex education and freely available contraceptives to minors.
        unityByFreedom 4y ago
        Okay. The topic was birth, not sex ed / contraceptives.
        vgt 4y ago
        You must have missed the point. If the goal is to reduce abortions, then the pro-life strategy is less effective than pro-choice.
        unityByFreedom 4y ago
        Pro-lifers can be pro-sex ed and pro-contraceptive. It would be your misunderstanding if you assume those must all go together.
    - dang 4y ago
      Please don't take HN threads further into flamewar hell, let alone generic religious flamewar hell, Satoshi help us. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]

toomuchtodo 4y ago

I admire the honesty around investing in the unsophisticated.

jacquesm 4y ago
Think about whole institutions created to indoctrinate people roughly from birth to remain unsophisticated.
- unityByFreedom 4y ago
  [flagged]
  - jacquesm 4y ago
    Sorry?
    - unityByFreedom 4y ago
      [flagged]
      - jacquesm 4y ago
        You did not name atheism you made some weird statement about 'the other institution' and how they would prevent births, which makes zero sense at all. Women should have the right to choose what they do with their own bodies, atheists and religious folks alike and those that have no horse in the race should stfu because all they are doing is telling other people how they should live, something that unfortunately is very common.
        unityByFreedom 4y ago
        That's one way of looking at it. But pro-lifers don't see it that way, so I was just presenting another point of view. I don't think telling them to stfu is productive.
        jacquesm 4y ago
        The term 'pro-life' is about as flamebait as it gets so you'll be doing your arguing with yourself on this subject from here forward.
        unityByFreedom 4y ago
        Many people self-describe as pro-life. It is not 'flamebait' for most people and neither is pro-choice.
      - Terretta 4y ago
        > The other institution may prevent your birth. Which is worse? You're mixing worldviews in your rejoinder. For an atheist, Atheism not preventing "your" birth as there is no soul ("you") waiting in the wings to prevent. No you to prevent until personhood after birth. Rather, to an atheist, it's enabling the filtering out of unfortunate humanist futures. No child need be brought into unwantedness, disease, insufficient support, or other misfortunes. As there is no supernatural providence (no God to provide), logically, one should not bring forth future humans into a lack of providing. The atheist assumes the mother is best qualified to evaluate this choice, and thus to make it. The atheist further presumes the mother is the person most affected by this choice (there is no other "you" yet), and thus has greatest right to make it. To be clear, many Christians hold the same view as this example atheist, particularly those who think living is defined by knowing, and being dead by not knowing: "For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not any thing, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten." – Ecc. 9:5 Roughly, those who believe there is no separate soul hanging around before or after an independent body by-and-large have no problem with holding a woman has a right to choose.
        unityByFreedom 4y ago
        > To be clear, many Christians hold the same view as this example atheist, particularly those who think living is defined by knowing, and being dead by not knowing And there are many Christians who regard support for abortion within the faith to have been influenced by atheism. I just think it's an interesting question that has no easy answer. When does life begin? Clearly, the fetus is alive. Saying they "don't know" doesn't make sense to me because it's not like I remember my first year outside the womb either.
      - vgt 4y ago
        Are you aware that a secular scientific approach to sexual health results in far fewer abortions? Chiefly proper sex education and freely available contraceptives to minors.
        unityByFreedom 4y ago
        Okay. The topic was birth, not sex ed / contraceptives.
        vgt 4y ago
        You must have missed the point. If the goal is to reduce abortions, then the pro-life strategy is less effective than pro-choice.
        unityByFreedom 4y ago
        Pro-lifers can be pro-sex ed and pro-contraceptive. It would be your misunderstanding if you assume those must all go together.
  - dang 4y ago
    Please don't take HN threads further into flamewar hell, let alone generic religious flamewar hell, Satoshi help us. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]