5 ms·
Very interesting, but I don't think these are bonds posted for the purpose of securing his appearance. Rather, these seem to be accounts of his that were seize
by nkurz 4y ago
Very interesting, but I don't think these are bonds posted for the purpose of securing his appearance. Rather, these seem to be accounts of his that were seized and will be subject to forfeiture if he is convicted. In the document you posted, these accounts are described as "property subject to forfeiture as a result of the offenses".
Am I misinterpreting? Do you reason outside the document to believe these relate to his bail?
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 4y agoBoth the letter and the judge's handwritten response refer to these as "appearance bonds".
- nkurz 4y agoI don't see the word "appearance" in the PDF you linked. Am I missing it? And could you perhaps link to the handwritten response you mention? It seems like it would be useful context.
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 4y agoWrong document. URL is off-by-one. Change 49 to 48. Please see: https://ia801508.us.archive.org/25/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.590940/gov.uscourts.nysd.590940.48.0.pdf https://ia801508.us.archive.org/25/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.5... Apologies for the inadvertence. Since cannot change URL or delete and resubmit, I changed the title to reflect the document.