> I'm not sure how the title got past the editors, considering how misleading it is. The editors of The Guardian want their readers misled. This is very delibe

> I'm not sure how the title got past the editors, considering how misleading it is. The editors of The Guardian want their readers misled. This is very deliberate. Everything the article says will be true if taken literally, except the quotes of interviewed people, which will often be lies. The crucial facts to understanding what happened will be either completely omitted (omission of facts is not a falsehood), or delegated to second half of of the article, and even then, it will typically be in vague, unclear terms. This is how media operates today, and it shouldn’t be surprising that the trust in media is collapsing across the board.