3 ms·
I think that the focus on "percentage of workforce" as a proxy for "amount of discrimination" is a bad idea. Frankly, I don't know how discrimination in the wor
by Throwaway218902 4y ago
I think that the focus on "percentage of workforce" as a proxy for "amount of discrimination" is a bad idea. Frankly, I don't know how discrimination in the workplace ought to be measured. I know that every single woman I know that works in tech has experienced sexual harassment in the workplace. At a company where I worked, male employees started telling female employees that they shouldn't be wearing pants to work and should be instead be wearing dresses and skirts.
Certainly, these experiences are anecdotal, but I've seen enough anecdotes personally (in addition to reading articles about discrimination at Uber and Blizzard) to suggest that discrimination is a non-negligible problem. I'd definitely be in favor of accurately measuring discrimination since, at the moment, all I know is that it happens to _some_ people, but I have no clue how big that group is.
I doubt that tech companies have any motivation to actually try to measure this accurately. A lot of the "pro-diversity" actions that tech companies have taken seem to be aimed to placate (sometimes misguided) employees worried about diversity issues, rather than trying to actually solve any actual problems.
- boppo1 4y agoHow do you accurately measure discrimination?
- paulryanrogers 4y agoAt large enough companies the aggregate ratios give a rough picture. One could also compare discrimination complaint rates to ratio of protected classes.
- boppo1 4y ago>At large enough companies the aggregate ratios give a rough picture. Could we apply this to entire fields? Does the fact that nursing is 84% female roughly indicate discrimination against men in the profession?
- paulryanrogers 4y agoWorth investigating
- 8f2ab37a-ed6c 4y agoOr the US prisoner population being 90% male. Or 94% of all preschool teachers being female.