3 ms·
> I will point out we have good reason to think this was not FSD, but rather autopilot or human driving No, the actual research says otherwise > If this exac
by wolverine876 4y ago
> I will point out we have good reason to think this was not FSD, but rather autopilot or human driving
No, the actual research says otherwise
> If this exact same thing had happened 20 years ago, we would all agree that the people to blame are the ones behind.
No, not if someone comes to a sudden stop in a busy lane.
- epgui 4y agoWhat “actual research”? This article? There’s no source.
- int_19h 4y agoComing to a sudden stop in a busy lane may well be necessary if there's some unexpected obstacle in front of you. Which is why road rules require maintaining sufficient distance to the car in front of you that if it has to brake hard, you have enough time to react and do the same thing without ramming into it. IIRC police has already said that at least some cars involved in the accident did not maintain such a safe distance, and their drivers thus bear their share of responsibility for the crash.
- cynix 4y ago> No, not if someone comes to a sudden stop in a busy lane. Why not? You’re meant to maintain enough distance to the car in front of you at all times that you should be able to come to a complete stop without rear-ending them.