3 ms·
No; it's close to 65356e6, not 65536e6 (3rd decimal is 3 not 5). Could be misreporting though...
by tromp 4y ago
No; it's close to 65356e6, not 65536e6 (3rd decimal is 3 not 5). Could be misreporting though...
- quickthrower2 4y ago“If we are going down, lets nerd snipe while we do!”