I meant that _learning_ is not a copyright violation. I do not see much space for misunderstanding: which relevant box takes instances of input data to output

I meant that _learning_ is not a copyright violation. I do not see much space for misunderstanding: which relevant box takes instances of input data to output one of them? Edit: Make your point explicit, sniper... You can hide in front of the ### consuetude of "silent disagreement", but it remains violently annoying. The article contains "nuances" like "derivative work", but the poster is objecting to the article calling «neural networks» not «copies», as «compressed lossy copies», and I retorted that so is everything you learn, and holding them in the "corpus" is not considered "retaining a copy". If you have objections to that, either you present them, or there is no contribution in shaking your invisible head.