3 ms·

Sort of, but this article seems to be specifically a response to a recent blog post that said that the answer was "Yes": https://sneak.berlin/20230115/macos-sca

• IndySun 4y ago
  Thank you. I much prefer Sneaks stance on Apple than eclectic light's. Both post enough useful public information to remind people that Apple are not as different to other giants in underhand software tech shenanigans. Eclectic often make us aware of Apple updating software without permission, which is bad enough, and commonly known on this forum. But Sneak will present reasons why Apple users should not become complacent, and for that I am grateful.
  • acdha 4y ago
    The problem is that Sneak tends towards conspiratorial thinking so you need to read posts through the lens of separating what’s factually established from what hypothetically could be done in the future.
    • IndySun 4y ago
      I do, as everyone should, filter. I find his writing straightforward, moreso than the twisted language of an average Apple 'event'. Conspiratorial may sound sensational to some, but saying one thing and doing another is apt and proportional for walled garden tech. It's a wide net cast. That's all.
      • acdha 4y ago
        I mentioned it mostly because their posts have enough reach that I not uncommonly see people repeating the hypotheticals as if they’d been verified.