5 ms·
> but what’s the benefit of going with a walled off proprietary $$$ tool when you can use something like this My day-to-day stack nowadays is mostly Python wit
by sco1 4y ago
> but what’s the benefit of going with a walled off proprietary $$$ tool when you can use something like this
My day-to-day stack nowadays is mostly Python with a smattering of others, but I’ve been using MATLAB for almost 15 years.
Like any other enterprise software, you’re paying for support and generally very good documentation. If you have a technical issue or even just a development question you get a response from a human within a day or two, often just a few hours.
There are also many domain-specific tools (e.g. Simulink) that do not have similarly functional open alternatives. Octave is great, but can lag behind new language features and generally isn’t 100% cross compatible. Whether or not this affects you is really dependent on your use case.
- CamperBob2 4y agoThere are also many domain-specific tools (e.g. Simulink) that do not have similarly functional open alternatives. It's interesting how close GNU Radio Companion is getting to Simulink's domain. I don't know if that's their plan or if things are just evolving that way, but I like it.
- marmetio 4y agoIt's been a few years since I've used gnu radio, but isn't it just time-series data flow?
- CamperBob2 4y agoYes, but so is a modern control system model.
- marmetio 4y agoI meant does gnu radio do anything else that simulink does, like have a solver or automatically set up sampling? Or is it just the data flow part?