5 ms·
The Wikipedia article of J Pollock has 0 photos of his work
- sp332 4y agoAccording to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jackson_Pollock#Commons_files_used_on_this_page_have_been_nominated_for_deletion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jackson_Pollock#Commons_f... there were a couple that were linked, but the files were deleted for probably violating copyright.
- mtmail 4y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Poles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Poles and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._5,_1948 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._5,_1948 are paintings with image. Go ahead and edit the wiki page and insert those.
- sp332 4y agoThat's interesting, because https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Bluepoles.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests... says that another copy of this image was deleted for being an "obvious copyright violation".
- yorwba 4y agoWikipedia allows "fair use" as justification for including non-freely licensed works (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blue_Poles_(Jackson_Pollock_painting).jpg#Fair_use_rationale_Blue_Poles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blue_Poles_(Jackson_Pollo... for Blue Poles specifically) while Wikimedia Commons does not.
- nullish_signal 4y agoIf "examples of abstract art" would suffice, my GPU can now spit those out pretty quick :^)