3 ms·
You would probably have a better chance of escalating any issue with a mail to anyone that isn't customer support. If you're a security researcher, imagine cust
by machina_ex_deus 4y ago
You would probably have a better chance of escalating any issue with a mail to anyone that isn't customer support. If you're a security researcher, imagine customer support as this big human firewall to communicating with this corporation, meant to be extremely strict so the communication with the rest of the cooperation won't be flooded with all the things customers want.
If you're not understanding this properly and wasting time trying to contact someone through customer support, that's on you. Which company doesn't even matter.
- arp242 4y ago> If you're not understanding this properly and wasting time trying to contact someone through customer support, that's on you. Which company doesn't even matter. There really are plenty of companies where this would have worked fine; I'm reasonably confident contacting support@ for something like this at all places I've ever worked would have been escalated. Maybe with some back-and-forth for 1 or 2 messages, but not outright refusal. One reason why I always try to have a good relationship with the support staff (including talking to them at company parties and the like) is so they're not afraid to "bother" me if they're not sure about something. Of course support shouldn't be bothering me with basic inane stuff, but as an organisation you can certainly foster different kind of cultures and attitudes. That said, your chances of this working are usually proportional to the size of the organisation: the larger the organisation, the less chance you have. Still, LastPass isn't that large, and the support person does seem rather obtuse. I suspect that Soatok's style of communication didn't help with that, as it may have caused the bozo bit to flip for the support person. This in turn seemed to have caused Soatok's bozo bit to flip for the support person as well. However, at the end of the day, it's primarily the company's responsibility they're contactable in a reasonable manner, and it's not "on you" if they're not. Having to e-stalk and contact random people who happen to work for LastPass is not reasonable.
- some_furry 4y agoI think it's more likely that they didn't know how to escalate it than I flipped the bozo bit. I eschewed like 4 email exchanges that weren't that interesting that was me trying different ways to explain the problem and the specific action I needed them to take. They're very boring and tedious to read, because nothing moved forward at all. If something I said did flip a bozo bit, it was either in the first contact (which I don't have a record of) or something I'm totally oblivious to, so I appreciate you calling that possibility out.
- machina_ex_deus 4y agoI'll translate your messages so you'll understand how you sound to customer support: "I reported a security valley to LastPass’s bug boopy bopy. Please ask your security team to look at the linked bug boopy bopy ticket. The teetee team shat the bed." "Allow me to explain carefully. I followed the steps in your security page, yes. I reported the issues I found to bowy. However, bowy employees take it upon themselves to teetee issues on behalf of their customers. In this case, the bowy employees shat the proverbial bed and incorrectly dismissed an issue I reported. Because the issue was closed as Not Applicable (erroneously), it’s unlikely that your security team will notice it without escalating some awareness of this teetee error to them. So please pass that onto your security team so they’re aware to look in the Rejected tab." "This is the order of operations so far: I identified a coopy seesee-channny in the LastPass software. I reported the issue to bowy with a detailed analysis and a patch for making the funky conta tammy like it was intended to be. Several days after I reported it, a bowy employee stupidly went “no FOL expee? not applicable” and closed it erroneously. I’ve contacted toto support with one goal in mind: To ensure your security team actually sees the report in spite of bowy closing it. I don’t care about whether or not your team overrides their decision. I just have an ethical obligation to disclose security issues. If this isn’t resolved by 5:00 PM Eastern today, I’m going to say “Fuck it” and go Full Disclosure. Escalate. Tell me when you’ve escalated. I don’t need your help beyond that." "Thank you for escalating. I don’t understand your question. I reevee egengi your software to study how it works, found a valley, and then reported it." That's how you sound. All he could notice is that you have something with shitting in beds twice, and that you "Fuck it". I bet from confusion he asked his manager what to do and the manager replied that you are a phishing email, and he didn't even understand that. If you do end up needing to talk to people who wouldn't understand you, explain nicely what are your credentials, don't shit in beds, and ask nicely to get direct contact with someone responsible who can understand you. Not broken telephone. Don't speak to people in gibberish to them. And honestly, shitting in beds is an uncommon saying and universally gross. Keep that shit to yourself. You're trying to communicate professionally, not be that barking dog shitting in beds. It's not the world's fault they can't take that seriously. It is your choice. Your words. Your image and communication isn't there to serve your internal identity, it's there so that people will respect you and take you seriously. I couldn't care less how you present yourself, but I assumed you're at least not oblivious to how you sound and look to everyone. I don't mean to insult, just to put a mirror. And to remind you this is your choice.
- gabbler 4y ago[flagged]